Nkechi Taifa: Lengthy Sentences: Cruel and "Usual"” Punishment
Date:  09-24-2015

Decades behind bars for first-time drug offenses should no longer be the norm
Lengthy Sentences: Cruel and ‘Usual’ Punishment

by Nkechi Taifa, Senior Policy Analyst, Open Society Foundations

This post is part of American Constitution Society’s ACSblog 2015 Constitution Day Symposium.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist, except as punishment for a crime ….” This criminal punishment exception to the 13th Amendment is all the more brazen when one considers the inhumanity of lengthy prison sentences today – often handed out in assembly-line fashion, and dispensed more often to Blacks. Although we call our system a criminal justice system, its focus is punishment and it punishes very severely. Punishment’s correlation to enslavement remains in the Constitution and, as such, must be closely scrutinized.

As a staff attorney for the ACLU’s National Prison Project in the 1980s, I often cited in my conditions of confinement briefs Chief Justice Warren’s notable 1957 quote in Trop v. Dulles. His statement heralded the importance of considering the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.” This principle recognizes a people’s moral growth due to advancements in attitude and approaches.

During the height of the war on drugs with mandatory minimum sentences firmly in vogue, unnecessarily long sentences were robotically meted out with seemingly callous abandon. Shocking punishments over the past 30 years of 10, 20, 30 years and life imprisonment for drug offenses hardly raised an eyebrow. These commonplace sentences snatched mothers from children, men from loved ones, and furthered the destabilization of families and communities. Such punishments should offend our society’s standard of decency. But they have not.

Read more.